|

As the festive season swings into action clubs and pubs across
the country are packing in the punters, with Britain’s army of bouncers
at the ready, watching for signs of trouble. But when things get ugly
on the dance floor, who’s watching them?
Words by Michelle Stiles
(First published in Stranger issue 12, November 2006)
When
it comes to bouncers, everyone seems to have an opinion. And often,
it’s a negative one. When I mentioned to friends that I was writing
this feature, comments like “Watch your back” and “Careful what you
write” came thick and fast. The stereotype of door staff as
knuckle-dragging thugs who punch first and ask questions later seems
engrained in our collective psyche.
But is this a fair picture? Over the last few years, the security
industry has made a concerted effort to clean up its act. When the
government put tackling alcohol-related violence at the top of its ‘to
do’ list a few years back, it decided that the (then unregulated)
security industry needed a makeover. Under the 2001 Private Security
Industry Act it established a new regulatory body, the Security
Industry Authority (SIA), tasked with bringing in a national licensing
system to weed out the ‘small criminal element’ that was giving the
industry a bad name. It’s now illegal to work as a door supervisor
(which in case you’re wondering is the politically correct term for
bouncer) unless you have a valid SIA licence. To get one, applicants
must undertake thirty hours of training and pass two exams, plus a
criminal records check (which they or their employers must pay for, at
around £400 - £500 a head).
Robert Buxton, Head of Media Relations at the SIA, believes that the
licensing scheme has radically improved the industry. “You’re always
going to get bad apples, and we know that still goes on, but more often
now we’re seeing door supervisors described as door staff, door men or
door supervisors, rather than bouncers. The perception is changing and
the way people work is changing.”
Sue Edwards, a licensing officer with Cornwall and Devon Police, also
believes the SIA training has been a success. “Ten or fifteen years
ago, there were some very unsuitable bouncers. These days, the majority
of door staff are very professional. Most work closely with the police;
in fact yesterday I publicly praised the staff from one local club for
assisting the police with an incident that was happening out on the
street.”
Unfortunately, there are some critics within the industry who see
things differently. Jon Adams, a security administrator who has worked
in the field for 27 years, believes that while the SIA licensing scheme
was a great idea in principal, in reality it’s done nothing to improve
standards, not least because – unbelievably – the obligatory training
doesn’t include first aid or physical restraint techniques. “The
training is totally inadequate,” he says. “The licensing system is just
a money-making exercise for the SIA. The industry could have been
improved simply by better policing and bigger fines or sentences for
people who crossed the line. The criminal records checks have weeded
out some of the old style thugs, but there are plenty of people who use
heavy handed tactics who’ve never been prosecuted for it and are still
working.”
Eleanor, a 24-year-old student who recently witnessed a particularly
nasty incident in Cornwall, can vouch for this. “I was walking through
town and came across a fight outside a bar. A male bouncer had a woman
pinned down on the road and was hitting her in the face. Two other
bouncers got him off her, but then they let him go and he started
hitting her again. Some people tried to help the woman, but the
bouncers started laying into them as well, and it turned into one big
fight, until the police arrived. I felt the other bouncers had no real
concern for this woman – they all knew each other and were just looking
out for themselves. It was disgusting.”
She was so disturbed by the incident that she phoned the police
afterwards to find out whether the man would be prosecuted. “Apparently
he was a licensed door supervisor from a takeaway up the road. It was
all caught on CCTV, and he had his licence revoked so he couldn’t work
anymore, but in the end he wasn’t prosecuted because no one would come
forward.”
So when push comes to shove on a Friday night, should we be running
towards the men (and occasionally, women) in black for help, or walking
briskly in the opposite direction? Getting an opinion from the horse’s
mouth isn’t easy. Most door supervisors aren’t exactly falling over
themselves to talk to the media. Fortunately, a friend of a friend
introduces me to his dad, Trevor, who’s been a door supervisor for 40
years. We meet in a local bar. Trevor’s a well built fellow, but that,
in my opinion, is where the stereotype ends. He’s a jovial, articulate
Cornishman with a twinkle in his eye, and full of tall tales about his
time in the industry. He works regularly as a head doorman at a club in
Cornwall, and runs his own security business employing around 70
people. He organises security for the Eden sessions, and has worked
many of the main events on the festival calendar.
In between anecdotes, Trevor becomes very serious, very quickly, when
discussing certain aspects of his profession (it’s also clear he’s
never quite off duty – he’s constantly glancing around the room to
check what’s going on). Door staff, he explains, are cagey about
revealing their identities to the media for good reason. “Years ago
when the SIA licensing was coming in, I appeared in a TV programme
about the industry with a male and female colleague. I wouldn’t give my
full name,” he says, “but my colleagues did and afterwards the woman
got two death threats. You have to understand, we’re dealing with some
dangerous people – criminals, drug dealers. Even now, when I get home
in my car, I have a quick look around before I get out.”
Over the years, he’s witnessed all manner of nasty incidents: “One of
the worst things was a double glassing. They took me into the room and
I couldn’t tell if the person was a man or a woman.” Trevor himself has
had glass shattered in his face, a finger nearly bitten off, and been
held at knifepoint. He was once knocked unconscious by members of the
National Front in the Whirlygig tent at Womad: “The doctor said I had
to rest for 48 hours so I went off and laid down under a tree for a
doze. I’d been laying there for about two hours when I got bitten by an
adder and had to go straight back to casualty!”
Like Jon, Trevor admits there are some people who shouldn’t be in the
business. “A lot of door supervisors are too quick to judge people,” he
says carefully. When I ask him if he’s ever lost his temper with
someone on the job, he thinks about it for a moment. “I don’t think I
ever really have,” he says. “If you’re working properly in a team,
there’s always someone else there who can step in to help. There’s no
need to get angry.” So what motivates him to do what is often a pretty
horrific job? “I like helping people,” he says simply. And though he’s
clearly a man that wouldn’t take any nonsense from anyone, I believe
him. In fact I think Trevor is a genuinely good bloke. That said, I’m
not at all convinced that all door supervisors are like Trevor.
|